City Council Candidates – November 6, 2018 Election

1) Elizabeth (Liz) Bates liz@lizforlaguna.com. Picked up nomination papers on 07/17/18 TURNED IN nomination papers: AUGUST 10, 2018 (Signatures verified by ROV – no Candidate Statement)

2) Peter Blake peterblakegallery@mac.com. Picked up nomination papers on 08/06/18 TURNED IN nomination papers: AUGUST 13, 2018 (Candidate Statement & Signatures verified by the ROV)
Check out Candidate Community Related Articles and Opinions: Peter Blake

3) Ann Christoph ann@ac-la.com. Picked up nomination papers on 07/25/18 TURNED IN nomination papers: AUGUST 10, 2018 (Candidate Statement & Signatures verified by the ROV)
Check out Candidate Community Related Articles and Opinions: Ann Christoph

4) Sue Marie Connolly suemarieinlaguna@qmail.com. Picked up nomination papers on 08/10/18 TURNED IN nomination papers: AUGUST 15, 2018 Signatures verified by ROV – no Candidate Statement
Check out Candidate Community Related Articles and Opinions: Sue Marie Connolly

5) Toni Iseman tiseman2@aol.com. TURNED IN nomination papers: AUGUST 9, 2018 (Candidate Statement & Signatures verified by the ROV)
Check out Candidate Community Related Articles and Opinions: Toni Iseman

6) Sue Kempf sueforcouncil2018@gmail.com. Picked up nomination papers on 07/16/18 TURNED IN nomination papers: AUGUST 8, 2018 (Candidate Statement & Signatures verified by the ROV)
Check out Candidate Community Related Articles and Opinions: Sue Kempf

7) Cheryl Kinsman carolijkahn@gmail.com. Picked up nomination papers on 07/16/18 TURNED IN nomination papers: AUGUST 14, 2018 (Candidate Statement & Signatures verified by the ROV)
Check out Candidate Community Related Articles and Opinions: Cheryl Kinsman

8) Lorene Laguna lorenelaguna@gmail.com. Picked up nomination papers on 07/24/18 TURNED IN nomination papers: JULY 30, 2018 (Candidate Statement & Signatures verified by the ROV)
Check out Candidate Community Related Articles and Opinions: Lorene Laguna

9) Judie Mancuso judie@judiemancuso.com. Picked up nomination papers on 07/16/18 TURNED IN nomination papers: AUGUST 2, 2018 (Candidate Statement & Signatures verified by the ROV)
Check out Candidate Community Related Articles and Opinions: Judie Mancuso

10) Allison Mathews jackalstudio16@qmail.com. TURNED IN nomination papers: AUGUST 10, 2018 (Candidate Statement & Signatures verified by the ROV)
Check out Candidate Community Related Articles and Opinions: Allison Mathews

11) Paul Merritt merrittmaster@yahoo.com. Picked up nomination papers on 07/25/18 TURNED IN nomination papers: AUGUST 10, 2018 (Candidate Statement & Signatures verified by the ROV)
Check out Candidate Community Related Articles and Opinions: Paul Merritt

This Candidate has withdrawn from the Election and is No Longer running for City Council. 12) Rob Zur Schmiede robz@voterobz.com. Picked up nomination papers on 07/19/18 TURNED IN nomination papers: AUGUST 6, 2018 (Candidate Statement & Signatures verified by the ROV).
Check out Candidate Community Related Articles and Opinions: Rob Zur Schmiede

Media and General Public Candidate Related Articles and Opinions for the November 6, 2018 Election Below:

LB Indy Columnist Billy Fried, “The Kibitzer: It’s Carnival Time”
Letter: Council Candidates Owe Voters Transparency – Laguna Beach Indy Newspaper
Liberate Laguna Wants Developer-Friendly Council –Laguna Beach Indy Newspaper

Updated – Public Safety Message from the Chief of Police

2021 Update Laguna Beach Police Crime report here

2020 Update Laguna Beach Police Crime report here

Updated Police Documents – Story from Stu News click here

Read the 59 page Laguna Beach PD Biennial Report 2017-2018 here

Date: August 17, 2018

Laguna Beach Residents:

Over the past few months there has been much concern expressed about crime and safety in our city. LBCHAT reached out to Laguna Beach Police Chief Laura Farinella and asked her to respond to the safety concerns.

Here is Chief Farinella’s response:

The City of Laguna Beach is an extremely safe city, and all police department employees have positively contributed to the reduction in crime. We are currently fully staffed at the sworn ranks, and with the support of the professional staff, it is these layered services that gives us the ability to function as if we were a much larger agency.

With 24 thousand residents and 6.5 million visitors, we are continuously challenged to meet and balance the needs of both the residential and visitor population. On a monthly basis, the leadership team meets to discuss crime and nuisance issues, and strategies to combat these issues, and how we can better engage with the community.

Here is some statistical data the police department maintains to monitor and analyze crime related activity.

Violent Crime Data here

Traffic Data* here *Laguna’s traffic accidents have actually decreased and the below chart shows that Coast Hwy (PCH) made up, on average, 22% or 13%, depending on where on Coast Hwy., and this is comparing three years of data. It may feel like more because PCH is used to get to where an accident may be and is the fastest way to get there. We use the data in the chart below to focus traffic enforcement and education.

Police Department August 15, 2018 SL Presentation here

Please direct questions on the data provided to: lfarinella@lagunabeachcity.net or call 949-497-0385.

___________________________________________________

LBCHAT supports Chief Farinella and our public safety staff. She takes an inclusive approach to leading and it is making a positive difference in our community. She is proud of our City, our public safety department staff and the progress made in connecting with residents and serving our extremely large tourism base.

Please share your thoughts with us? click here

As a resident, do you feel safe at home?
Do you feel safe while out and about in our City?
Do you think the City is providing adequate public safety services?
What areas do you feel could be improved?
Have you contacted the City with public safety concerns in 2018?
Do you have personal story to share?
Do you attend City Hall Meeting?
Are you aware that the City offers community educational and training classes for residents?

Guest Review: South Laguna Tourist Quagmire

Date: August 16, 2018
Subject: August 15, 2018 meeting on tourist Impacts in South Laguna.

Comments from South Laguna resident Michele Monda:

I attended the South Laguna Civic Association (SLCA) meeting on Wednesday night (August 15th) to hear an update on what the Laguna police, lifeguards and county parks staff are doing to make South Laguna safer. “I was delighted to hear that with the increased beach patrols, citations are up and crime and nuisance complaints are down.”
Questions among the 25 people who attended were related to what could be done about the lack of toilets, increased jay walking across PCH and the parking problem that has not been resolved. City staff said they would look into these issues. So, “I guess we still have a ways to go to address the South Laguna tourist quagmire.”

Michele Monda
South Laguna

View the LB Police Department August 15, 2018 Presentation. Click here

Please share your thoughts with us. Click here

Did you attend this meeting?
Do you live in South Laguna?
What specific issue(s) prompted you to attend the meeting?
Were you satisfied with the City progress report?
Were you satisfied with the OC Parks report?
Did you agree with the statistics provided in the reports?
Are there other issues you are concerned about that weren’t covered?
What issue have they addressed that you are most relieved or pleased about?
Have you personally contacted the City or County to report on an issue in 2018?
Anything else you would like to share?

Thank you! The more we speak up the more we improve our quality of life in South Laguna and our City.

Guest Article – Coastal Short-Term Rental Supporters Ignore Historic Nuisance Laws

Coastal city Short-Term Rental proponents ignore legally-binding land use
concepts, typically using meritless, fatally flawed arguments at hearings.
They’re good for business? Unfortunately, coastal trends since 2000
are “Commerce first, residents second.” By residents I mean those NOT
owning potential STR parcels.

Favoring commerce over 40+% of the population who rent year-round plus
percentages of full-time owners not wishing to acquire permits, that constitute
an incontestable majority, the commerce tail is wagging the communal quality
of life dog.

Beyond permit fees, there’s no proof that more STR would appreciably increase
general municipal revenue via boarders spending significant taxable amounts
at businesses. Often tenants are extended families and friends. They’ll be
saving money by cooking and drinking at the rental, not out.

They increase or assist public access to our beaches? A classic straw man
argument. Yes, a few hundred more people will be ensconced, but the Cal
Coastal Commission is dead wrong on this one. Otherwise, why allow more and
more parking meters, increasing rates plus climbing violation fees? Aren’t
limited time meters a form of infringement, inhibition or visitation disincentive?
Coastals increasingly allow increased intensification of use for restaurants and
bars without demanding increased onsite parking. Why doesn’t the CCC object
to that, these sites eat up yet more public parking, thus decreasing access,
don’t they?

STR’s homes are their castle, limitations constitute a de facto taking? That
ignores the basics of common civility, public and private nuisance laws traced
back to King Henry III:

“Private nuisance: An unreasonable, unwarranted invasion, where actions of
the defendant cause a substantial interference with another’s use/enjoyment
of their property. Public nuisance: The defendant’s actions materially affect
the reasonable comfort and convenience of life of the community.”

No one has the inalienable right to use their property to the diminishment of
their neighbor(s). Yes, some operators are vigilant and do not abuse the terms
and conditions. The nightmares abound, absentee owners are trying to
maximize income to offset, mitigate their taxes and maintenance. They bought
the parcel without STR rights: Enhancing private revenue models is NOT the
community’s problem.

The sales industry knows this, the Real Estate Disclosure Act of 1987 is explicit:
Seller MUST disclose any adverse condition that COULD affect the value. Listed
housing is theoretically forced to reveal the obtrusive potential if in proximity.
STR actually diminish property values, now THERE’S a fiscal infringement,
irregular taking including tort (litigation) exposure.

*Roger E. Bütow is a professional land use consultant and 46-year
resident of Laguna Beach