A good Friday evening to you!What follows is a summary of the City Council meeting set for Tuesday, May 12th, 2026.In this summary, I cover what I think are the more noteworthy items that will appear on the Council agendas. If you want to see the entire agenda, click here. My agenda summary doesn’t include all of the items up for consideration – just ones that I think should have additional community awareness. Please share this with others if you represent a neighborhood association (thanks!). Our meetings generally start at 5:00 p.m. on the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays of the month at Laguna Beach City Hall, 505 Forest Avenue – the meeting is in the Council Chambers adjacent to Fire Station #1.This week we have a Study Session, starting at 3:00 p.m. and going til about 4:40 or so. The big item on the calendar is ourProposed Budget for the City for Fiscal Year 2026-27, the year that begins on July 1, 2026. Again, this is the proposed budget – it is subject to corrections, revisions, new ideas, and updates between now and adoption time on June 23rd, 2026.I’m going to highlight here what I think are the most consequential things in the document:
- Two buckets of revenues – hotel bed taxes (or TOT) and sales taxes – are projected as generally flat. Property taxes are projected to be up a modest amount. We have one larger hotel going out of service for repair soon (something that will last two years or so), and sales taxes overall have trended flat.
- We’re proposing eliminating or ending 8 positions (all positions that were staffed – but have no current incumbents), and adding one (a jailer, merging two part-time positions). This may still change before the Final Budget’s approval. This is different from holding positions vacant (we have some of those, too).
- We have a Capital Improvement Fund that receives about $8M in general fund sources of revenues. Given that Public Works has a backlog of projects, I’m suggesting that we take a year to use these funds to transfer a portion to operations and assign the rest to both brick and mortar capital projects and other one-time needs – like replacing a portion of our costly 800Mhz system radios, adding to our Wildfire Mitigation & Fire Safety Fund, and restoring some of our Insurance Reserves. We’ll still do a significant amount of capital projects – including streets, roads, and wastewater projects. I wanted to assign a bit more funds for Fire Station costs, in case the national economic environment impacts that.
- We’ve also trimmed back multiple line items from last year, from contract services to capital outlay.
- Importantly, we are proposing modest service reductions to off-season Trolley services and to off-season On Demand/Laguna Local.
- We also are asking the Council to authorize us to start charging a fare of up to $5 per rider on Laguna Local. I know, Laguna Local is a terrific benefit for many – and to retain it, we think we should charge a modest fare. It’s not uncommon in other locations where their micro-transit charges a fare. We examined charging a fare on the Trolley, but it’s challenging and costly to collect – maybe more expensive than the revenue we’d generate. Further, we don’t want a fare level that would cause people NOT to use Trolley and its seasonal parking lots (instead, driving into town In their cars and causing more traffic).
- The budget includes a modest citywide parking fee increase for meters, lots, and pay station areas (but not for Shoppers Permits!) – this was recently approved by the Planning Commission and takes effect soon. Remember that the California Coastal Commission regulates (via our CDP process) what we can charge for parking, as well as hourly durations of parking.
There are more, but those are some of my highlighted items. The General Fund part of the proposed budget accepts a transfer from the Capital Improvement Fund (which also is made up of revenues typically in General Funds) and is balanced – we will again not draw from reserves (instead, we’ll add to them slightly to maintain the 20% contingency reserve and roughly 7.5% in disaster contingency reserves).I know that the budget as proposed will have its detractors – but I’d ask you all to consider where we are today. With sales taxes being flat, a hotel being down, and as we approach the crest of our annual PERS costs (these go from $7.1M in FY 2025-26 to $9.1M in FY 2026-27 and to $10.5M in FY 2027-28 – then they flatten, and slowly start to decline by 2030-31), we need to be cautious. At the same time, the City has the same cost pressures (wages, insurance, fuel, benefits) that you see at home. I try to cut back where I can, but I also don’t want to unilaterally disarm from visitor impacts and ratchet back core safety and maintenance services.Again, this proposed budget is a discussion piece to be examined, probed, questioned, have its errors fixed, and edited then brought back to you all by the end of June, 2026. I earnestly welcome ideas as to other approaches.Wrapping this subject up (for now), I really appreciate the Finance team’s work on the proposed budget to date, as well as my departmental colleagues’ willingness to pare back.Regular Session (starts at 5:00 p.m.)I’ll highlight these items:
- We have the proposed adoption of the Master Fee Schedule – this one raises many Community Development fees to start catching them up to actual costs. Appeals fees – now at $2,500 – are proposed to go to $4,500 (less than we first asked for at $6,290). Council members can still “call for review” projects (for “free”) when asked, and where merited. Council can also remand fees to the appellant if Council finds that an abuse of discretion occurred in the deliberative process.
- The approval of another Utility Undergrounding District, this time along South Coast Highway and funded in part by our Street Light fund and in part by SCE’s Rule 20A program. It’s always nice to see more lines going underground, especially along evacuation corridors.
- A big item will be the Council’s consideration of whether to take a position on a pending petition before the California Department of Fish and Game Commission to declare a new “no take” section of the waters off of South Laguna. The existing State Marine Protected Area (where no take is allowed) is off of central and north Laguna. In other words, folks would not be able to fish or take other marine life in South Laguna, too.
- Two public hearings involve nuisance abatement steps for weeds and view blockages on private property – if you think your property might be on the list, you should maybe fix the nuisance now.
Otherwise the City does it, and we apply the charge to your property tax.
- I mentioned above the possible fare for Laguna Local. That is involved in a separate agenda item involving awarding a contract following a competitive procurement for Trolley and On-Demand services. The proposed award of a 5-year contract would go toLAZ parking, which is our current vendor. But included in the action steps is authorization to charge up to $5 for the On Demand fare.
- Last item of great import is the consideration of a long-discussed “Design Review Efficiency Ordinance” – these are proposed changes to our Zoning Code that move some things out of Design Review entirely, and that moves other things from DRB to Administrative DR. There’s more in here, too, so those of you who pay great attention to Design Review should read the staff report and the redline ordinance. This is “first reading” of the main ordinance, but there also is an urgency ordinance planned for introduction a few weeks from now that would make some aspects of the changes apply on adoption. I appreciate the hard work of the City Attorney team and Community Development (as well as DRB and the Planning Commission) to get to this point.
There are no appeals items on the May 12th agenda, but there are three the following day – Wednesday, May 13th (aka our next “Appeals Day” – starting at 3:00 p.m!) will hear appeals to the Council involving:
- 31526 Valido – this is a property in South Laguna and involves the Egan homestead site.
- 31985-31987 Coast Highway – this involves a property on the ocean side of South Coast Highway across from 10th Street.
- 238 Chiquita Street – this involves a proposal to place an ADU on a property that has a home on the Historic Register.
As to community notes, I wanted folks to be aware of a couple things that have happened and some that are coming up:
- The Planning Commission this week heard (and amended and then approved) a plan for paid on-street parking along South Coast Highway including spots from Moss Street south to nearly Three Arch Bay. This still has complex implementation steps ahead, but please see the PC’s agenda page if you want to watch that discussion and presentation.
- Coming up on the May 26th meeting – but hopefully with a detailed draft staff report presented in advance – is a furtherance of the Council’s discussion about Laguna Canyon Road. When we last left this issue, the City was considering whether to accept the “relinquishment” of the road from Caltrans, along with accepting $14.4 million in funding that comes with the road. Staff was asked to further examine liability issues, possible improvements and their funding (especially undergrounding!), and what improvements could be achieved if Caltrans kept the roadway vs. our ownership of it. It’s a complex issue and discussion. Remember that the main reason to consider this at all is safety – Caltrans will not allow the utility lines to be undergrounded in a manner that is feasible – even though this is a critical wildfire zone and evacuation / ingress route. But if the City owned the road, that could occur more easily (funding permitting). I’ll write more about this soon.
- A Promenade update. The underground work in nearing completion, so construction will move soon into the next phase – installing the new herringbone brick in the center of the promenade and near businesses. The brick work will mainly be done at night so as to not disrupt the businesses. Also planned but date TBD will be craning in and planting some of the trees (which now include a 96” box sycamore, 2 120” box southern live oaks, and several 48” box eucalyptus polyanthemos). Please review thePromenade web page for more updates.
As always, thanks for reading this far. Also, please join us if you can at the actual meeting. If you don’t want to be on this email list, please let me know and I’ll remove you (no hard feelings – we all get a lot of emails).
Dave KiffCity Manager, City of Laguna Beach505 Forest AvenueLaguna Beach, CA 92651949-497-0704 | dkiff@lagunabeachcity.netRemember to use Ask Laguna via our website or via app! It’s a great way to report in possible concerns and violations. Have you signed up for Nixle yet? Text 92651 to 888-777 to get alerts and other important City information as it happens.
Month: May 2026
Laguna Beach Council: Speculative Gambling vs. Investing In Our Future
The Acquisition Of Laguna Canyon Road (SR 133), PCH (Highway 1) & Multimillion $$$ Parking Structures Aren’t Necessary To Our Future
Laguna Beach City Council Majority: Out-Of-Control & Needlessly Expensive Acquisitions
The unicumber, like 4 of our LBCC members, is spineless and has no central nervous system with a clearly visible brain either.
So too the unicumber apparently survives having only a digestive tract. In other words, our Council intakes, digests and processes money and power instead of micro-organisms, excretes the waste unnecessary for its survival—in the cases of the 133, Highway 1 & parking structures, our Council “waste discharges” our precious money into an infinite, alarming future.
These acquisitions (identified as “Projects” herein) constitute fiscal suicide. The funding and goals, the objectives expressed for the 133 and Highway 1/PCH Projects never needed to be pursued in the way they are presently, basically gambling that eventually we’d get what we want.
Investing shouldn’t carry the mark of the economic devil beast: Speculative wagers.
Michele Monda (in the LB Independent) has noted and been clarion-calling, pounding the warning drum out about this in recent columns: Between acquisition sticker prices added to specific alterations/improvements added to ongoing O&M costs, these 2 road movies involve hundreds of millions of $$$ in commitments today, into tomorrow and the next day and day after that.
Betting with house money (ours) that we can assume ownership and then it’s “X-mas Wish List City,” free presents under the tree. Ah yes, Laguna Beach City Council, where gross sum debt service is a way of life!
Bob (What, Me Worry?) Whalen going to a PUC hearing recently, kow-towing, begging for utility under-grounding in the Canyon (public safety and open space hazard issues) or Alex (Frat Boy Wonder) Rounaghi unethically cutting deals behind closed doors with politicians of questionable character and integrity aren’t the most efficient or least expensive path forward.
Rogue Council members, renowned for their myopia and invertebrate leanings, aren’t the funding ambassadors we should be using. As a regional, state and international destination, these Barney Fife’s aren’t capable of entering into high digit, underwriting procurement negotiations.
In Rounaghi’s case, as outed by Michele Monda, who asked him to do this in ex parte chats before his anointment as our representative was discussed at a public hearing? No, not at end of a LBCC meeting when everyone’s left or is half-asleep. At the beginning, and an action item: See who votes to delegate such a negotiation role broaching the transfer of ownership.
The French politician Georges Clemenceau said that “War is too important to be left to the generals.” PCH and the 133 are too important to have Whalen and Rounaghi, diplomatic rubes, grovel, ramble about on bended knee.
Hiring a very good lobbyist firm who is ensconced in Sacramento, has experience in infrastructure, socializes continuously with key committee members in DC, in our legislature and Governor’s Offices could, for a fraction of those millions, get us what we want.
That’s how and why they stay in business, by succeeding. And their competitive portfolio successes can be readily accessed and appraised. If failures, they disappear, capitalistic survival of the fittest.
They often work behind the scenes, including connections with elected aides and other staff. They get the eyes and ears of officials that our Councilmembers might not ever reach let alone even be aware of. The corridors and back alleys of power are their “native habitat” as it were.
If that disturbs anyone, then grow up: Pragmatically, this is where the political system is, and as we’re no longer a village or funky town but an increasingly urbanized city, we need to (as native Californian Joan Didion put it) “Play it as it lays.” Wake up and smell today’s reality coffee.
Co-authored grants and earmarked funds in partnership with Caltrans/DOT, plus US Department of Transportation/Commerce could provide supplemental money needed to make both arteries achieve our community’s targets, the outcomes we’d all like to see.
So spending a few million instead seems intelligent—except our Big 4, like the unicumber, appear to lack any higher cerebral organs between them: Like the Scarecrow in Oz said to Dorothy, if they only had a brain.
Under the National Highway System mandates, states are encouraged to focus federal funds on improving the efficiency and safety of this network. The 133 is on this list.
And why didn’t we get the 133 (Laguna Canyon Road) also listed as a State Scenic Route, like Highway 1 (PCH) long ago? Or is this Council poised to permit yet more blight, more fiascos like Louis Longi’s Work/Live Folly which a SSR listing could preclude?
Considering these 2 major arteries facilitate both county and state transportation, i.e., transiting critical top commerce turf needs along our So Cal coast and especially assist tourism (of which the state gets a piece of the industry action), why do we need to purchase them?
They’re assets and big ticket liabilities that we can do without. We can get the improvements, the cosmetic and infrastructural alterations we seek without buying them…..thus uncomplicated solutions.
We’ve already financially sacrificed by our open space acquisitions that benefit everyone, by our community’s protective vigilance.
We just need to hire the right lobbyists to work their “candidate funding” magic behind the Sacramento and Washington D.C. curtains. In my field (the water utility industry), this is SOP, yet here our country bumpkin, just-fell-off-the-turnip truck Council history thrives and proliferates.
The utilities I work around keep their lobbyists on retainer, and “job out” grant writing. Who writes our grants and what expertise do they really have, especially in the transportation funding area?
Hiring lobbyists for a fraction of the costs of ownership could, within a few years, get BOTH of our main arteries listed, certified in BOTH categories, hence qualify ASAP for the ducats.
CalTrans can’t very well complain if we help find the money, make it part of the decision tree equation, can they? They’ll be happy to hear us stop whining and griping.
Contemporaneously, lobbyists could petition for funds to underwrite the changes we wish to see from other “buckets” like beautification, without massive $$$ encumbrances or post-ownership acquisition O&M costs.
Certainly Les Miklosy’s mobility concept elements can be integrated, “efficiency and safety” implemented, can’t they?
Laguna can achieve its reasonable goals and objectives regarding PCH and the 133 without a veritable tsunami of red ink.
“There is only one difference between a bad economist and a good one: The bad economist confines himself to the visible effect; the good economist takes into account both the effect that can be seen and those effects that must be foreseen.” Frederick Bastiat 1850
One can’t help but assume those parking structure Projects are like the pyramids of Egypt, meant to glorify the hubris of leadership yet fly in the face of fiscal prudence, hundreds of millions wasted on visible yet seldom used urbanization homages.
Laguna isn’t just an ideal, dream destination for over 7 million visitors each year: We bring in a lot of money, dispersed across County, State and even national coffer lines. Some here have embraced what a few internationally famous places do: Entrance fees!
We don’t need to do instigate or initiate that “tolling” tactic. And we don’t need to buy the infrastructure that assists those visitations and makes radiated commuting a more modern, pleasant and efficient endeavor (presently more like a Disney adventure ride).
Well, shouldn’t these same beneficiaries I’ve mentioned help us modernize, preserve and protect Laguna as THEIR asset, worthy of diverted, earmarked funding? Not in speculation but in the form of an investment in its viable future?
Seems to me what’s missing is any open, transparent discussion of alternatives like lobbyists, but we’re stuck like a fly in amber with archaic, old school methodologies: Sic transit gloria mundi Laguna Beach City Council.
Forest Ave. Trees Midnight Massacre Update @ Laguna Beach City Council, Tuesday, April 28, 2026
Fear & Loathing In Laguna Beach: An Orchestrated, Rehearsed Whipping Post For Legitimately Alarmed Residents: SAVE PLANET LAGUNA!
Roger E. Bütow,
Community Contributor
Courtesy of Laguna Beach Patch
The Rude Ambushed The Civil, Meek and Mild-Mannered
The Promenade is only the first exploitative step in the “Uber-commodification” of Laguna: It’s all about the Benjamin’s under the present CC, the dismantling and reassemblage of this quintessentially eclectic, funky surf So Cal gem formerly know as Laguna openly in the name of more affluent visitors, a CC seated and fiscally driven by “crony capitalism.”
As a veteran of numerous confrontations with city, county and water district officials back in my eco-NGOs prime (1998—2004), the “Review & File” item on the 4/28/2026 CC agenda held several “tells” for me.

The City’s 2 main pilot fish were front and center for support—and to chastise those whom they didn’t agree with, came to neutralize after applying liberal gobs of chapstick, getting petted and stroked as lapdogs with a “Whose a good boy, huh?” from their masters.
Review & File means: It won’t have any action elements, nothing’s really gonna happen, no parts or whole voted upon. Once opened up for public comments after a brief Power Point and statement by the City Manager, it was as I thought, away we go to the City’s Wonderland reality.
It was difficult to ignore the repeated allegations of vitriolic language and unprecedented rudeness (“J’accuse”), the lies aimed at the SOTS (Save Our Trees) cabal that kept spewing from the mouths of these egotistical self-appointed community leaders. 2 in particular as obnoxious, bellicose and insulting as I’ve ever heard them. Recruited City Hall smack-asses talking smack! They reset the bar, next stop? The sludgy bottom after the worship, the ring-kissing and groveling.
The accusations they rained down were ironic: They comported themselves in the compost-like manner that they accused their perceived opponents of—You spot it? You got it! You smelt it, you dealt it, you old homers.

I think the justified language and vehemence used by righteously outraged, gut-punched residents at the confrontation the night of the slaughter (aka Midnight Massacre) was being conflated with this CC meeting on purpose. This MM attendance was being held to the actions of others. These 2 senior citizens seemed to have confused the venues and attendees, twisting real events with their paranoia for their masters, lapdogs that these 2 are.
What others said several weeks previously at an entirely different venue and under different traumatic circumstances was, twisted, distorted, misdirected and rife with alternative facts. IOW, seemed like these septuagenarians just made crap up…..Needed their late nighty-night meddies, tucked in at an assisted care facility? Were you never young, passionate and motivated to mobilization. Boring, no wonder you’re still boring.
And the lead off tear jerker from the City Manager was hysterical. The same man who had informed many of the officials in City in the know in advance of the butchery and performed a blatant lie of omission. A lot of faith and trust with the public, if there ever was much, evaporated.
He didn’t tell them that within a hour of the MM Zoom meeting, the klieg lights, chain saws and chippers would come out down at the Promenade, the 8 trees cut off at their stumps, the trunks and branches chopped up and hauled away. One eucalyptus had already toppled at the roots a month before.
Always after the fact, the City vivisectionists eventually admitted that they anticipated the turmoil, alerted the PD, prepared for a tide of emotional community-wide response.
Obviously the CM’s “adorbs” little speech was covert emotional manipulation, meant to not only deflect some of his responsibility and the CC’s but make it more difficult to criticize a seemingly humbled man, upset on par with the community.Yeah, sure.
For newbies especially, an inherent suspicion of deceptive behavior for advantage by their own officials is foreign. So congrats on losing your virginity. You’ll remember such a peak experience, especially don’t forget the Judas-like betrayal.
Buffering is what happened that night of the CC update meeting, immediately raising an emotional barrier, a redirection or deflection, an attentuation of anger or rage worked. Just as a mother dove fakes a broken wing in the wilderness to draw a predator away from her chicks, so too the CM fell on his sword, took the blame to distract those present.
Here was a “mea culpa, mea maxima culpa” from on high. I was watching on cable tv, his face wasn’t shown but I swear I heard faint sobbing or sniveling (how adores), to emphasize that he’s suffering too (I feel you) after seeing those trees from our collective history disappear.
By the end of the topic’s discussion, everybody seemed remorseful and contritious, almost weepy, Kumbaya, Guantanamera, whatevs. So the City strategy seemed a sublimely coercive one, by the CM and CC getting the room to feel sorry for and forgive themselves, recruit organized public commenters; overly-forceful ones and punitive at that.
The activists were relatively few, pell-mell, gentle and sincere. I saw measured frustration and anger, patience that my edgy NGO CLEAN WATER NOW would have never shown. I saw/heard neither incivility or contrived disruption.
As for those responsible and supportive of the City’s blindside sneak attack on the trees, who for one minute believed their own propaganda, enobled a CC and praised them as if brave decisive heroes, you must go through a lot of chapstick.
Denigrating and demeaning people exercising their rights (many for the first time from accounts), it felt as though the most venomous were clearly rehearsed. Brownie points were being scored and archived, banked for future leveraging (political graft and influence) right there in Chambers.
And puh-leeze. Declaring this THE best CC ever is absurd. If they were, they would’ve created a path with options (off ramps) in 2024 that supported a let Laguna vote initiative and then abided by that will. They’re deep into crony capitalism and wiping the City we’ve all loved off the map. Bring in the affluent.
They even took a lot of Promenade oversight out of regulatory domain via exemptions. That the majority of residents didn’t want it, were willing to take it to the streets, intimidated them.
The dominant body of the SAVE PLANET LAGUNA tree huggers didn’t show up in great numbers, the more hard core seemed MIA–but maybe they read the tea leaves. Done deal. Perhaps a younger, not yet coalesced crowd, a new constellation with a different style will emerge “NEXT GEN 3.0?”
Watching from home, unfortunately, was painful, like watching a car wreck in slo-mo, but deja vu as well. Being reminded of how totally bogus and phony government is from my early years (late 90s), the “tells” added up, so I don’t blame the more committed, the more hard core to sit that one out in anticipation of more irresponsible acts to follow (and more WILL follow), watch their own officials wiggle their way out of further accountability fallout.
I think the tree slaughter triggered some of the same intrinsic, visceral responses I remembered from my water quality actionist history. Power doesn’t necessarily corrupt but it does attract the corruptible. I would comment that those in the room who only paid lip service (recruited by CC as suck-up shills) but didn’t experience the inner trauma in horror, you probably never have nor will.
One thing seemed unavoidable: The City had totally screwed up regarding that PR and communications aspect. The CM said the buck stopped with him? Then he needs to begin looking for another job elsewhere.
Moreover, it might have been a Brown Act violation (or multiple), the City having intentionally withheld information that the public had every legal right to be aware of along the dispositive route, plus the way that the CM and CC had communicated in irregular manners.
Gotta wonder what else has been withheld: What else don’t we know and when won’t we know it?
“The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know.The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.” Brown Act
The schism this deflective shielding created ( a Klingon type cloaking device), the division it unleashed or at least antagonized, and yes the hostility as a function of fatal lapses of human appreciation of Nature and community sensitivity, was one of the CM’d first stress tests: And he failed. We’re all advised, never start out a relationship with a lie.
The CM gets paid $315,000/year, plus a like amount in benefits. Here’s a link to his 2024 contract….the first of 3 years, it has already grown substantially: lagunabeachcity.net/home/showpublisheddocument/21434/638763363719170000
You’d have to be extremely naive to believe that part of his duties isn’t to be a fall guy like Tuesday night, the scape goat when required. It’s not spelled out in a CM’s contract, but it’s a known element by those in the know. He buffers, takes the spotlight and heat off the CC.
And BTW, his job entails thespian services, act as if he serves you, he feels your distress, is empathetic to your plight when interfacing—-Pathetic posing is more like it, he doesn’t see himself as working for you, he works for who signs his hefty paycheck, a 3 member majority of the CC. So he only needs to be able to count to 3. He’s just not that into you.
For my part, I hope to not only educate in these columns, drawing upon my 30 years of what I call “actionism,” my professional portfolio, but my eco-consultant/analyst skills and experiences acquired, plus my NGOs “institutional knowledge.”
I’ve begun a series of columns I’ve dubbed “The Groundwater Chronicles.” First one was published in the LB INDY on 4/30/2026. I hope to acquire more space down the line as I envision it to be at least 3 of them at that outlet total. Plus re-start my writing here @ the Patch. edition.pagesuite-professional.co.uk/html5/reader/production/default.aspx?pubname=&pubid=bd9cdd70-3779-4e10-b577-01f5cade836d
Here’s one stop shopping for all things great and small, Sea Level Rise in Laguna Cali. A heavy protein meal, might want to chew and digest it slowly: coastal.ca.gov/climate/slr/
The Sea Level Rise Adaptation challenge may also prove to be an effective tool to halt the ginormous urban renewal project that is the 115 acre Downtown Specific Plan Phase II redevelopment catastrophe: lagunabeachcity.net/government/departments/community-development/planning/current-projects/housing-initiatives-1290
I’ve tasked myself, as my last rodeo, my final enviro-campaign, with turning this into a “wedge issue” for the 2026 LBCC race. If only 1 candidate figures out the can of worms potential, makes it their own, it opens a Pandora’s box the CC and their friendlies will have trouble closing.
Wresting control away from these greedy wolves in sheep’s clothing (Commerce First, Resident’s Last) can be done. And at the end of the day, command and control is the bottom line. That’s what happened, what disturbed City Hall earlier this week. They lost control and that frightens, that threatens them.
“Some people will rob you with a 6-gun, some with a fountain pen.” Woody Guthrie
They’re the fountain pen type, a “Take Back Laguna” movement needs kick-starting. Eradicate the now prevalent “crony capitalism.” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crony_capitalism
Flip the flipping CC as flipping fast as flipping possible, seize the next few years and begin unraveling, dismantling as much of the damage already done or in planning as possible.
Ex.: The vendor analyst who presented at the Scoping Session Workshop for the Downtown Phase II EIR lied. He said that his firm was told to “model” for 450-675 units, but that upper # was capped, wouldn’t be built out beyond 450.
Maybe the lower #, enough to fulfill the State minimum of 394. Liar liar pants of fire, once again he does his master’s bidding, whomever signs his corporation’s check is his boss, not us. That too was like many presentations, we call them “dog ‘n pony shows” to dupe the interested parties
Once the EIR is certified and officially filed with the State, it’ll be a gold rush in the holler. Nellie bar the door, the back door and counter at Community Development and Building Dept., kept from the public negotiations to the maximum extent possible will start. Not transparent, those cronies will get the inside rail. As will FORMER CC members.
I come from the enviro-review industry, believe me via an addendum or amendment to the certified, Final EIR, it’s EZ PZ to jack it up to that upper modeling #. That’s the entire idea, that’s this CC’s goal.
Translation: Offer the incentive of building all units in one centralized area, and then Mayor Mark Orgill along with the CM declared to the room, sadly, there was no alternative. BS.
He might run for re-election 1 time, having the advantage of incumbency. That’s because he needs to complete HIS check list, what HE will need in place when he steps down and puts his developer hat back on. Turning Downtown gold into his retirement platinum, heritage wealth.
All of our mitigation bucks on one path: The over-development, the inappropriate and catastrophic Downtown nightmare. Like major cosmetic surgery, an extreme makeover, take that old familiar friend we knew and loved, make her a Kardasian, the trendoid pneumatic botox and silicon type to bring the affluent into an area so horrendously under-parked as to boggle the mind.
The vibe of Laguna most of us have enjoyed over the years (visitors too) kind of a kicked back, casual Mexico-meets-Hawaii deal will be eradicated. Those aren’t the market they seek—They’ve openly stated that it’s the affluent they’re rebuilding for.
When MO ran for CC he alleged that he was no longer a developer, a real estate entrepreneur, that puts a lie to that claim. Enter-The-Manure. All of the affected “paternal ‘tude,” like the CM’s “I feel you” is a scam, a con, while they and their developer BFFs carve up Downtown on planning boards and spreadsheets.
Sound familiar, it’s like the trees, sorry to break it to you, no alternative. Really? Notice how little choice they offer? It’s our Canyon Creek’s flood plain, the first place in town after the Promenade as a crash test dummy, the first to likely exhibit the deleterious effects, the symptoms of sea level rise.
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
Heard anyone in City Hall broach the subject of a Sea Level Rising Adaptation Plan in reference to CIPs planned, yet more pimping of Laguna? So all of these Downtown development plans but no mention or acknowledgement of the calamitous sword of Damocles hovering, how will the City protect Downtown from the rising tide? Are they gonna wait until surf is rolling into The Rivian during a King High Tide, ’cause that’s ground zero?
Fact: from the foot of Forest down to Broadway, PCH is between 6-9 feet above Mean Seal Level (MSL). The ocean’s rising about 1″/year, many university study groups are recalibrating, scientists now feel it’s been rising faster these past few years, intruding further inland horizontally but also filtering into our groundwater, accelerating.
It’s going to take a lot of brain time and beaucoup $$$ to develop a cure or remedy protection plan. Yet they keep writing blank checks for frivolous, luxury CIPs in both Downtown and at Aliso, the 2 lowest, most vulnerable points.
lagunabeachcity.net/home/showpublisheddocument/18425/638487716525200000
And judging by this CC, who is rapidly painting us into a corner as every day that passes leaves us short of dealing head on with tactics or budget allowances, don’t bet on them letting us have a proactive or preemptive choice, just like The Promenade.
Barring a miracle our next 1-2 gens of taxpayers’ll be paying their dues. They’ll leave with the tab running and responsibility in your children’s laps. And a slew of new brushed concrete 2 and 3 story buildings Downtown that will convert a formerly funky So Cal coastal surf village icon into a totally boojie leggos dump.
Them? They’ll be dead or retired elsewhere, leaving their messes behind. Their crony capitalist pals fatter, richer, including MO after he leaves CC. And a city now on the precipice of BK, will be under water both literally and fiscally. “Lively up yourself.”
Once again, browse this link, look at the HUGE expenditures that’ll be needed to protect Downtown. These political hacks, every election cycle, declare that public safety is the top priority.coastal.ca.gov/climate/slr/
Shouldn’t we begin developing our Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan now instead of securing massive development building block entitlements.
Wouldn’t it be supremely stupid to start building/rebuilding first, then plan? That’s the present CC: “Dare To Be Stupid.”
NEXT CHAPTER: What the grotty future Downtown skyline and streets might resemble, what the demanding and unique construction dynamics for urban renewal might be, plus the mass indemnification intrigue.
I’ll also reveal how the City can increase the additional 450 units up to that 650 inventory (by Addendum or Amendment), pimping Laguna….Addenda without a public hearing or public review, amendment via a Revised/Subsequent EIR or or separate Mitigated Neg Declaration.
It’s Mourning In Laguna: No mas aloha. Hola, Bienvenidos Gordon “Greed Is Good” Gekko.
Otherwise the City does it, and we apply the charge to your property tax.